What principle does the "Just Desserts" model emphasize in criminal justice?

The "Just Desserts" model in criminal justice fundamentally emphasizes the appropriateness of punishment based on the severity of the offense. This model operates on the principle that individuals should receive sentences that are proportionate to the crimes they commit. Essentially, it reinforces the idea that the punishment should fit the crime, ensuring that those who commit more severe offenses face stricter penalties.

This approach aligns with the notion of moral accountability, asserting that offenders deserve to be punished in a manner that reflects the seriousness of their actions. By focusing on the gravity of the offense, the "Just Desserts" model aims to establish a fair and just punitive system where the scale of punishment corresponds directly to the extent of the wrongdoing.

This principle contrasts with other approaches in criminal justice, such as rehabilitative or restorative justice models, which may prioritize reducing recidivism or restoring the victim and community over strictly proportionate punishment. Additionally, it does not suggest leniency based on behavior or mitigate consequences for lesser offenses, which emphasizes the need for consistency and fairness in sentencing across the board.